more details in serial performance summary
This commit is contained in:
@ -154,12 +154,13 @@ and change several settings incrementally:
|
||||
#. Use tight PPPM convergence (1.0e-6 instead of 1.0e-4): 161.9 katom-step/s
|
||||
#. Use Ewald summation instead of PPPM (at 1.0e-4 convergence): 19.9 katom-step/s
|
||||
|
||||
The numbers show that gains from aggressive compiler optimizations are rather
|
||||
small in LAMMPS, the data access optimizations in the OPENMP (and OPT) packages
|
||||
are more visible. On the other side, using more accurate force field settings
|
||||
causes, not unexpectedly, a significant slowdown. Finally, using regular Ewald
|
||||
summation causes a massive slowdown due to the bad algorithmic scaling with
|
||||
system size.
|
||||
The numbers show that gains from aggressive compiler optimizations are
|
||||
rather small in LAMMPS, the data access optimizations in the OPENMP (and
|
||||
OPT) packages are more prominent. On the other side, using more
|
||||
accurate force field settings causes, not unexpectedly, a significant
|
||||
slowdown (to about half the speed). Finally, using regular Ewald
|
||||
summation causes a massive slowdown due to the bad algorithmic scaling
|
||||
with system size.
|
||||
|
||||
Examples comparing parallel performance
|
||||
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user