From 8332afd2b24f9838a615af378d82040473736409 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Evangelos Voyiatzis Date: Tue, 10 Mar 2020 15:27:51 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] one more spelling error --- doc/src/pair_coul_slater.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/doc/src/pair_coul_slater.rst b/doc/src/pair_coul_slater.rst index 7432f862c6..4ff6a91e5e 100644 --- a/doc/src/pair_coul_slater.rst +++ b/doc/src/pair_coul_slater.rst @@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ distribution in the Coulomb potential, following the formulation of E = \frac{Cq_iq_j}{\epsilon r} \left( 1- \left( 1 + \frac{r_{ij}}{\lambda} exp\left( -2r_{ij}/\lambda \right) \right) \right) \qquad r < r_c -where :math:`r_c` is the cutoff distance and :math:`\lamda` is the decay length of the charge. +where :math:`r_c` is the cutoff distance and :math:`\lambda` is the decay length of the charge. C is the same Coulomb conversion factor as in the pair\_styles coul/cut and coul/long. In this way the Coulomb interaction between ions is corrected at small distances r. For the *coul/slater/cut* style, the potential energy for distances larger than the cutoff is zero,