replace parsed-literal with code-block where applicable. improve typesetting

doc/src/python.rst

@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@ Examples
 """"""""
 
 
-.. parsed-literal::
+.. code-block:: LAMMPS
 
    python pForce input 2 v_x 20.0 return v_f format fff file force.py
    python pForce invoke
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ Examples
    python factorial input 1 myN return v_fac format ii here """
    def factorial(n):
      if n == 1: return n
-     return n \* factorial(n-1)
+     return n * factorial(n-1)
     """
 
    python loop input 1 SELF return v_value format pf here """
@@ -69,10 +69,10 @@ Examples
      # loop N times, increasing cutoff each time
 
      for i in range(N):
-       cut = cut0 + i\*0.1
-       lmp.set_variable("cut",cut)                 # set a variable in LAMMPS
+       cut = cut0 + i*0.1
+       lmp.set_variable("cut",cut)               # set a variable in LAMMPS
        lmp.command("pair_style lj/cut ${cut}")   # LAMMPS commands
-       lmp.command("pair_coeff \* \* 1.0 1.0")
+       lmp.command("pair_coeff * * 1.0 1.0")
        lmp.command("run 100")
     """
 
@@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ variable.  This must match the *func* setting for this command.  For
 example these two commands would be self-consistent:
 
 
-.. parsed-literal::
+.. code-block:: LAMMPS
 
    variable foo python myMultiply
    python myMultiply return v_foo format f file funcs.py
@@ -262,7 +262,7 @@ consider this function loaded with two global variables defined
 outside the function:
 
 
-.. parsed-literal::
+.. code-block:: python
 
    nsteplast = -1
    nvaluelast = 0
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ a pointer to LAMMPS.  The mechanism for doing this in your
 Python function is as follows:
 
 
-.. parsed-literal::
+.. code-block:: python
 
    def foo(lmpptr,...):
      from lammps import lammps
@@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ A more interesting example is in the examples/python/in.python script
 which loads and runs the following function from examples/python/funcs.py:
 
 
-.. parsed-literal::
+.. code-block:: python
 
    def loop(N,cut0,thresh,lmpptr):
      print "LOOP ARGS",N,cut0,thresh,lmpptr
@@ -373,13 +373,13 @@ which loads and runs the following function from examples/python/funcs.py:
      natoms = lmp.get_natoms()
 
      for i in range(N):
-       cut = cut0 + i\*0.1
+       cut = cut0 + i*0.1
 
        lmp.set_variable("cut",cut)                 # set a variable in LAMMPS
        lmp.command("pair_style lj/cut ${cut}")     # LAMMPS command
        #lmp.command("pair_style lj/cut %d" % cut)  # LAMMPS command option
 
-       lmp.command("pair_coeff \* \* 1.0 1.0")       # ditto
+       lmp.command("pair_coeff * * 1.0 1.0")       # ditto
        lmp.command("run 10")                       # ditto
        pe = lmp.extract_compute("thermo_pe",0,0)   # extract total PE from LAMMPS
        print "PE",pe/natoms,thresh
@@ -486,7 +486,7 @@ in your Python function is failing, because you have not initialized the
 variable foo:
 
 
-.. parsed-literal::
+.. code-block:: python
 
    foo += 1
 
@@ -494,7 +494,7 @@ If you put one (or more) statements inside a "try" statement,
 like this:
 
 
-.. parsed-literal::
+.. code-block:: python
 
    import exceptions
    print "Inside simple function"