Specifying dimensions, lamda->lambda

This commit is contained in:
jtclemm
2023-03-20 15:34:52 -06:00
parent d15e13d475
commit badfd0bc40

View File

@ -62,11 +62,11 @@ sets of bins are then used to construct the neighbor lists as as further
described by Shire, Hanley, and Stratford :ref:`(Shire) <multi-Shire>`
and Monti et al. :ref:`(Monti) <multi-Monti>`. This imposes some extra
setup overhead, but the searches themselves may be much faster. For
instance in a dense binary system with a ratio of the size of the largest
to smallest collection bin :math:`\lamda`, the computational costs of
building a default neighbor list grows as :math:`\lamda^6` while the costs
for *multi* grows as :math:`\lamda^3`, equivalent to the cost of force
evaluations, as argued in Monti et al. :ref:`(Monti) <multi-Monti>`.
instance in a dense binary system in d-dimensions with a ratio of the size
of the largest to smallest collection bin :math:`\lambda`, the computational
costs of building a default neighbor list grows as :math:`\lambda^d` while
the costs for *multi* grows as :math:`\lambda^d`, equivalent to the cost
of force evaluations, as argued in Monti et al. :ref:`(Monti) <multi-Monti>`.
By default in *multi*, each atom type defines a separate collection
of particles. For systems where two or more atom types have the same