ICODE-ADC/lammps
4
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Clarifying break no alternate

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
jtclemm
2024-12-09 11:14:29 -07:00
parent 2562d3afc4
commit fdfe6d54c6
2 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

5
doc/src/bond_bpm_rotational.rst
View File

@ -156,8 +156,9 @@ If the *break* keyword is set to *no*, LAMMPS assumes bonds should not break
during a simulation run. This will prevent some unnecessary calculation.
The recommended bond communication distance no longer depends on bond failure
coefficients (which are ignored) but instead corresponds to the typical heurestic
maximum strain used by typical non-bpm bond styles. One cannot use *break no*
with *smooth yes*.
maximum strain used by typical non-bpm bond styles. Similar behavior to *break no*
can also be attained by setting arbitrarily high values for all four failure
coefficients. One cannot use *break no* with *smooth yes*.
If the *store/local* keyword is used, an internal fix will track bonds that
break during the simulation. Whenever a bond breaks, data is processed

5
doc/src/bond_bpm_spring.rst
View File

@ -119,8 +119,9 @@ If the *break* keyword is set to *no*, LAMMPS assumes bonds should not break
during a simulation run. This will prevent some unnecessary calculation.
The recommended bond communication distance no longer depends on the value of
:math:`\epsilon_c` (which is ignored) but instead corresponds to the typical
heurestic maximum strain used by typical non-bpm bond styles. One cannot use
*break no* with *smooth yes*.
heurestic maximum strain used by typical non-bpm bond styles. Similar behavior
to *break no* can also be attained by setting an arbitrarily high value of
:math:`\epsilon_c`. One cannot use *break no* with *smooth yes*.
.. versionadded:: TBD