An additional layer has been added into the phase system hierarchy which
facilitates the application of phase transfer modelling. These are
models which exchange mass between phases without the thermal coupling
that would be required to represent phase change. They can be thought of
as representation changes; e.g., between two phases representing
different droplet sizes of the same physical fluid.
To facilitate this, the heat transfer phase systems have been modified
and renamed and now both support mass transfer. The two sided version
is only required for derivations which support phase change.
The following changes to case settings have been made:
- The simplest instantiated phase systems have been renamed to
basicTwoPhaseSystem and basicMultiphaseSystem. The
heatAndMomentumTransfer*System entries in constant/phaseProperties files
will need updating accordingly.
- A phaseTransfer sub-model entry will be required in the
constant/phaseProperties file. This can be an empty list.
- The massTransfer switch in thermal phase change cases has been renamed
phaseTransfer, so as not to be confused with the mass transfer models
used by interface composition cases.
This work was supported by Georg Skillas and Zhen Li, at Evonik
This change means that getApplication still works if we have a
controlDict.orig, rather than a controlDict. This allows us to simplify
the scripting of tutorials in which the controlDict is modified.
Introduced thermalPhaseChangePopulationBalanceTwo- and MultiphaseSystem as
user-selectable phaseSystems which are the first to actually use multiple mass
transfer mechanisms enabled by
commit d3a237f560.
The functionality is demonstrated using the reactingTwoPhaseEulerFoam
wallBoilingPolydisperse tutorial.
Patch contributed by VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd and Institute
of Fluid Dynamics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR).
- Thermal phase change and wall boiling functionality has been generalized to
support two- and multi- phase simulations.
- Thermal phase change now also allows purePhaseModel, which simplifies case setup.
- The phaseSystem templates have been restructured in preparation of multiple
simultaneous mass transfer mechanisms. For example, combination of thermal phase
and inhomogeneous population balance models.
Patch contributed by VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland Ltd and Institute
of Fluid Dynamics, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden - Rossendorf (HZDR).
The fundamental properties provided by the specie class hierarchy were
mole-based, i.e. provide the properties per mole whereas the fundamental
properties provided by the liquidProperties and solidProperties classes are
mass-based, i.e. per unit mass. This inconsistency made it impossible to
instantiate the thermodynamics packages (rhoThermo, psiThermo) used by the FV
transport solvers on liquidProperties. In order to combine VoF with film and/or
Lagrangian models it is essential that the physical propertied of the three
representations of the liquid are consistent which means that it is necessary to
instantiate the thermodynamics packages on liquidProperties. This requires
either liquidProperties to be rewritten mole-based or the specie classes to be
rewritten mass-based. Given that most of OpenFOAM solvers operate
mass-based (solve for mass-fractions and provide mass-fractions to sub-models it
is more consistent and efficient if the low-level thermodynamics is also
mass-based.
This commit includes all of the changes necessary for all of the thermodynamics
in OpenFOAM to operate mass-based and supports the instantiation of
thermodynamics packages on liquidProperties.
Note that most users, developers and contributors to OpenFOAM will not notice
any difference in the operation of the code except that the confusing
nMoles 1;
entries in the thermophysicalProperties files are no longer needed or used and
have been removed in this commet. The only substantial change to the internals
is that species thermodynamics are now "mixed" with mass rather than mole
fractions. This is more convenient except for defining reaction equilibrium
thermodynamics for which the molar rather than mass composition is usually know.
The consequence of this can be seen in the adiabaticFlameT, equilibriumCO and
equilibriumFlameT utilities in which the species thermodynamics are
pre-multiplied by their molecular mass to effectively convert them to mole-basis
to simplify the definition of the reaction equilibrium thermodynamics, e.g. in
equilibriumCO
// Reactants (mole-based)
thermo FUEL(thermoData.subDict(fuelName)); FUEL *= FUEL.W();
// Oxidant (mole-based)
thermo O2(thermoData.subDict("O2")); O2 *= O2.W();
thermo N2(thermoData.subDict("N2")); N2 *= N2.W();
// Intermediates (mole-based)
thermo H2(thermoData.subDict("H2")); H2 *= H2.W();
// Products (mole-based)
thermo CO2(thermoData.subDict("CO2")); CO2 *= CO2.W();
thermo H2O(thermoData.subDict("H2O")); H2O *= H2O.W();
thermo CO(thermoData.subDict("CO")); CO *= CO.W();
// Product dissociation reactions
thermo CO2BreakUp
(
CO2 == CO + 0.5*O2
);
thermo H2OBreakUp
(
H2O == H2 + 0.5*O2
);
Please report any problems with this substantial but necessary rewrite of the
thermodynamic at https://bugs.openfoam.org
Henry G. Weller
CFD Direct Ltd.
Contributed by Juho Peltola, VTT
Notable changes:
1. The same wall function is now used for both phases, but user must
specify phaseType ‘liquid’ or ‘vapor’
2. Runtime selectable submodels for:
- wall heat flux partitioning between the phases
- nucleation site density
- bubble departure frequency
- bubble departure diameter
3. An additional iteration loop for the wall boiling model in case
the initial guess for the wall temperature proves to be poor.
The wallBoiling tutorial has been updated to demonstrate this new functionality.
In most boundary conditions, fvOptions etc. required and optional fields
to be looked-up from the objectRegistry are selected by setting the
keyword corresponding to the standard field name in the BC etc. to the
appropriate name in the objectRegistry. Usually a default is provided
with sets the field name to the keyword name, e.g. in the
totalPressureFvPatchScalarField the velocity is selected by setting the
keyword 'U' to the appropriate name which defaults to 'U':
Property | Description | Required | Default value
U | velocity field name | no | U
phi | flux field name | no | phi
.
.
.
However, in some BCs and functionObjects and many fvOptions another
convention is used in which the field name keyword is appended by 'Name'
e.g.
Property | Description | Required | Default value
pName | pressure field name | no | p
UName | velocity field name | no | U
This difference in convention is unnecessary and confusing, hinders code
and dictionary reuse and complicates code maintenance. In this commit
the appended 'Name' is removed from the field selection keywords
standardizing OpenFOAM on the first convention above.
