The FOAM file format has not changed from version 2.0 in many years and so there
is no longer a need for the 'version' entry in the FoamFile header to be
required and to reduce unnecessary clutter it is now optional, defaulting to the
current file format 2.0.
The pressure work term for total internal energy is div(U p) which can be
discretised is various ways, given a mass flux field phi it seems logical to
implement it in the form div(phi/interpolate(rho), p) but this is not exactly
consistent with the relationship between enthalpy and internal energy (h = e +
p/rho) and the transport of enthalpy, it would be more consistent to implement
it in the form div(phi, p/rho). A further improvement in consistency can be
gained by using the same convection scheme for this work term and the convection
term div(phi, e) and for reacting solvers this is easily achieved by using the
multi-variate limiter mvConvection provided for energy and specie convection.
This more consistent total internal energy work term has now been implemented in
all the compressible and reacting flow solvers and provides more accurate
solutions when running with internal energy, particularly for variable density
mixing cases with small pressure variation.
For non-reacting compressible solvers this improvement requires a change to the
corresponding divScheme in fvSchemes:
"div\(alphaPhi.*,p\)" -> "div\(alphaRhoPhi.*,\(p\|thermo:rho.*\)\)"
and all the tutorials have been updated accordingly.
The MomentumTransportModels library now builds of a standard set of
phase-incompressible and phase-compressible models. This replaces most
solver-specific builds of these models.
This has been made possible by the addition of a new
"dynamicTransportModel" interface, from which all transport classes used
by the momentum transport models now derive. For the purpose of
disambiguation, the old "transportModel" has also been renamed
"kinematicTransportModel".
This change has been made in order to create a consistent definition of
phase-incompressible and phase-compressible MomentumTransportModels,
which can then be looked up by functionObjects, fvModels, and similar.
Some solvers still build specific momentum transport models, but these
are now in addition to the standard set. The solver does not build all
the models it uses.
There are also corresponding centralised builds of phase dependent
ThermophysicalTransportModels.
pMin and pMax settings are now available in multiphaseEulerFoam in the
PIMPLE section of the system/fvOptions file. This is consistent with
other compressible solvers. The pMin setting in system/phaseProperties
is no longer read, and it's presence will result in a warning.
and renamed defaultSpecie as its mass fraction is derived from the sum of the
mass fractions of all other species and it need not be inert but must be present
everywhere, e.g. N2 in air/fuel combustion which can be involved in the
production of NOx.
The previous name inertSpecie in thermophysicalProperties is supported for
backward compatibility.
All heat transfers that result from mass-transfer are now implemented in
terms of sensible enthalpy, so that they are consistent regardless of
which form of energy is being solved for. This has removed some spurious
temperature anomalies from a number of cases involving mass-transfer.
All heat transfers that result from mass-transfer are now linearised. In
the case of multi-specie systems this requires the specification of a
residual mass fraction, which is given by a new "residualY" keyword in
the constant/phaseProperties dictionary. If this entry is omitted for
multi-specie systems then linearisation is deactivated.
**** Details for developers ****
Methods have been added to the base heat transfer phase systems to
permit energy transfer as a result of phase change, without coupling to
a diffusive heat transfer model. These functions require a "weight" to
be specified in the call to define how the latent heat is divided
between either side of the interface. A weight of 0 indicates that the
latent heat is dissipated entirely in the upwind phase, and 1 means it
is entirely in the downwind phase.
The forms of latent heat calculation and transfer have been standardised
between the various phase systems. There are now two methods of
calculating the latent heat, and two methods of applying the transfer
(see below for details). These options are currently hard-coded into the
systems that use them, but they could be made user modifiable
per-mass-transfer in future.
Interface temperatures are now stored by the derived phase systems
alongside their corresponding mass transfer rates. These temperatures
are passed by argument to the phase-change heat transfer methods
provided by the base heat transfer systems. This allows multiple
mechanisms of mass transfer each involving different interface state to
occur across the same interface.
These changes have allowed all phase systems to use the same set of
base energy-transfer functionality.
**** Even more details for developers ****
The two forms of latent heat scheme available are:
symmetric: The latent heat is calculated as the difference between
the interface enthalpies on either side of an interface.
This is the simplest form.
upwind: The latent heat is calculated as the difference between
the bulk enthalpy on the side of the interface that mass
is being transferred from and the interface enthalpy on
the side of the interface that mass is transferring to.
This form may confer some stability benefits.
The two format of latent heat transfer are:
heat: The latent heat is applied by transferring heat unequally
on either side of an interface using the difference
between the bulk phase temperatures and the interface
temperature. No explicit latent heat source is required.
This method has a stability advantage over the "mass"
option, but the transfer is not energy conservative
unless the interface temperature is exactly correct.
mass: The latent heat is applied as an explicit mass transfer
source to both sides of an interface. The ratio between
the heat transfer coefficients on either side determines
what proportion of the latent heat source ends up in each
phase. Heat transfer is calculated equally on both sides
of an interface using bulk phase temperatures and is not
coupled to the thermal effect of phase change. This
method has the advantage of being energy conservative
even if the interface temperature is not exact, but it is
less stable than the "heat" option at extreme conditions.
foamDictionary executions are now wrapped by runApplication like any
other execution so that they do not print during a test loop.
foamDictionary does not produce a conforming log, however, so
log.foamDictionary has been filtered out of the formation of the test
loop report so that false failures are not reported.
