runApplication isn't needed for foamDictionary as it doesn't log
anything of consequence. Using runApplication leads to false unconfirmed
completion warnings in the test loop as foamDictionary does not generate
an end statement.
The changeDictonary setup has been removed and replaced with a more
typical boundary condition setup. Dictionary variables and wildcards
have been used to reduce repetition of the simulation parameters.
The tutorial now also demonstrates how to run a multi-region CHT case
completely in parallel. If run-time post processing was being utilised
there would be no need for reconstruction at any point.
A new constraint patch has been added which permits AMI coupling in
cyclic geometries. The coupling is repeated with different multiples of
the cyclic transformation in order to achieve a full correspondence.
This allows, for example, a cylindrical AMI interface to be used in a
sector of a rotational geometry.
The patch is used in a similar manner to cyclicAMI, except that it has
an additional entry, "transformPatch". This entry must name a coupled
patch. The transformation used to repeat the AMI coupling is taken from
this patch. For example, in system/blockMeshDict:
boundary
(
cyclic1
{
type cyclic;
neighbourPatch cyclic2;
faces ( ... );
}
cyclic2
{
type cyclic;
neighbourPatch cyclic1;
faces ( ... );
}
cyclicRepeatAMI1
{
type cyclicRepeatAMI;
neighbourPatch cyclicRepeatAM2;
transformPatch cyclic1;
faces ( ... );
}
cyclicRepeatAMI2
{
type cyclicRepeatAMI;
neighbourPatch cyclicRepeatAMI1;
transformPatch cyclic1;
faces ( ... );
}
// other patches ...
);
In this example, the transformation between cyclic1 and cyclic2 is used
to define the repetition used by the two cyclicRepeatAMI patches.
Whether cyclic1 or cyclic2 is listed as the transform patch is not
important.
A tutorial, incompressible/pimpleFoam/RAS/impeller, has been added to
demonstrate the functionality. This contains two repeating AMI pairs;
one cylindrical and one planar.
A significant amount of maintenance has been carried out on the AMI and
ACMI patches as part of this work. The AMI methods now return
dimensionless weights by default, which prevents ambiguity over the
units of the weight field during construction. Large amounts of
duplicate code have also been removed by deriving ACMI classes from
their AMI equivalents. The reporting and writing of AMI weights has also
been unified.
This work was supported by Dr Victoria Suponitsky, at General Fusion
Surfaces are specified as a list and the controls applied to each, e.g. in the
rhoPimpleFoam/RAS/annularThermalMixer tutorial:
surfaces
(
"AMI.obj"
"shaft.obj"
"wall.obj"
"statorBlades.obj"
"rotorBlades.obj"
);
includedAngle 150; // Identifes a feature when angle
// between faces < includedAngle
trimFeatures
{
minElem 10; // minimum edges within a feature
}
writeObj yes; // writes out _edgeMesh.obj files to view features
If different controls are required for different surfaces multiple
sub-dictionaries can be used:
AMIsurfaces
{
surfaces
(
"AMI.obj"
);
includedAngle 140; // Identifes a feature when angle
// between faces < includedAngle
trimFeatures
{
minElem 8; // minimum edges within a feature
}
writeObj yes; // writes out _edgeMesh.obj files to view features
}
otherSurfaces
{
surfaces
(
"shaft.obj"
"wall.obj"
"statorBlades.obj"
"rotorBlades.obj"
);
includedAngle 150; // Identifes a feature when angle
// between faces < includedAngle
trimFeatures
{
minElem 10; // minimum edges within a feature
}
writeObj yes; // writes out _edgeMesh.obj files to view features
}
Existing feature edge files corresponding to particular surfaces can be specified using
the "files" association list:
surfaces
(
"AMI.obj"
"shaft.obj"
"wall.obj"
"statorBlades.obj"
"rotorBlades.obj"
);
files
(
"AMI.obj" "constant/triSurface/AMI.obj.eMesh";
);
includedAngle 150; // Identifes a feature when angle
// between faces < includedAngle
trimFeatures
{
minElem 10; // minimum edges within a feature
}
writeObj yes; // writes out _edgeMesh.obj files to view features
The nonRandomTwoLiquid and Roult interface composition models have been
instantiated (and updated so that they compile), and a fuller set of
multi-component liquids and multi-component and reacting gases have been
used.
The selection name of the saturated and nonRandomTwoLiquid models have
also been changed to remove the capitalisation from the first letter, as
is consistent with other sub-models that are not proper nouns.
Streamlines can now be tracked in both directions from the set of
initial locations. The keyword controlling this behaviour is
"direction", which can be set to "forward", "backward" or "both".
This new keyword superseeds the "trackForward" entry, which has been
retained for backwards compatibility.
An additional layer has been added into the phase system hierarchy which
facilitates the application of phase transfer modelling. These are
models which exchange mass between phases without the thermal coupling
that would be required to represent phase change. They can be thought of
as representation changes; e.g., between two phases representing
different droplet sizes of the same physical fluid.
To facilitate this, the heat transfer phase systems have been modified
and renamed and now both support mass transfer. The two sided version
is only required for derivations which support phase change.
The following changes to case settings have been made:
- The simplest instantiated phase systems have been renamed to
basicTwoPhaseSystem and basicMultiphaseSystem. The
heatAndMomentumTransfer*System entries in constant/phaseProperties files
will need updating accordingly.
- A phaseTransfer sub-model entry will be required in the
constant/phaseProperties file. This can be an empty list.
- The massTransfer switch in thermal phase change cases has been renamed
phaseTransfer, so as not to be confused with the mass transfer models
used by interface composition cases.
This work was supported by Georg Skillas and Zhen Li, at Evonik
The implementation of the porousBafflePressure BC was incorrect in OpenFOAM-2.4
and earlier and corrected during the turbulence modeling rewrite for
OpenFOAM-3.0. This update introduced the density scaling required for the
definition of pressure in interFoam which requires the porosity coefficients to
be reduced.
Resolves bug-report https://bugs.openfoam.org/view.php?id=2890
Also added tutorial case demonstrating usage. Note that the new drag
models are symmetric and should be used without any blending.
This work was supported by Georg Skillas and Zhen Li, at Evonik
