ENH: simplify method names for reading argList options and arguments

- use succincter method names that more closely resemble dictionary
  and HashTable method names. This improves method name consistency
  between classes and also requires less typing effort:

    args.found(optName)        vs.  args.optionFound(optName)
    args.readIfPresent(..)     vs.  args.optionReadIfPresent(..)
    ...
    args.opt<scalar>(optName)  vs.  args.optionRead<scalar>(optName)
    args.read<scalar>(index)   vs.  args.argRead<scalar>(index)

- the older method names forms have been retained for code compatibility,
  but are now deprecated
This commit is contained in:
Mark Olesen
2018-01-08 15:35:18 +01:00
parent 2feb11dbeb
commit 345a2a42f1
168 changed files with 1161 additions and 1040 deletions

View File

@ -95,7 +95,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
argList args(argc, argv, false, true);
if (args.optionFound("mask"))
if (args.found("mask"))
{
Info<< "bit width: " << unsigned(sizeof(unsigned)*CHAR_BIT) << endl;
reportInfo<1>();
@ -135,7 +135,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
Info<< "size: " << packLst.size() << nl;
if (args.optionFound("count"))
if (args.found("count"))
{
unsigned int rawCount = 0;
forAll(rawLst, elemI)
@ -149,7 +149,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
<< "packed count: " << packLst.count() << nl;
}
if (args.optionFound("info"))
if (args.found("info"))
{
packLst.printInfo(Info);
}