MRF: Separate MRF from fvOptions

fvOptions does not have the appropriate structure to support MRF as it
is based on option selection by user-specified fields whereas MRF MUST
be applied to all velocity fields in the particular solver.  A
consequence of the particular design choices in fvOptions made it
difficult to support MRF for multiphase and it is easier to support
frame-related and field related options separately.

Currently the MRF functionality provided supports only rotations but
the structure will be generalized to support other frame motions
including linear acceleration, SRF rotation and 6DoF which will be
run-time selectable.

applications/solvers/basic/potentialFoam/potentialFoam.C

@@ -80,6 +80,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
     pisoControl potentialFlow(mesh, "potentialFlow");
 
     #include "createFields.H"
+    #include "createMRF.H"
     #include "createFvOptions.H"
 
     // * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * //
@@ -90,8 +91,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
     // function objects so do it ourselves
     runTime.functionObjects().start();
 
-    fvOptions.makeRelative(phi);
-
+    MRF.makeRelative(phi);
     adjustPhi(phi, U, p);
 
     // Non-orthogonal velocity potential corrector loop
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@ int main(int argc, char *argv[])
         }
     }
 
-    fvOptions.makeAbsolute(phi);
+    MRF.makeAbsolute(phi);
 
     Info<< "Continuity error = "
         << mag(fvc::div(phi))().weightedAverage(mesh.V()).value()