fvOptions are transferred to the database on construction using
fv::options::New which returns a reference. The same function can be
use for construction and lookup so that fvOptions are now entirely
demand-driven.
The abstract base-classes for fvOptions now reside in the finiteVolume
library simplifying compilation and linkage. The concrete
implementations of fvOptions are still in the single monolithic
fvOptions library but in the future this will be separated into smaller
libraries based on application area which may be linked at run-time in
the same manner as functionObjects.
Uses a system/caseProperties file to select templates from
etc/caseDicts/createZeroDirectoryTemplates to enable high-level setup
of a case.
See
- etc/caseDicts/createZeroDirectoryTemplates
- tutorials/preProcessing/createZeroDirectory
- moved control to functionObject (from bc)
- this allows multi-region support
- see heatTransfer/chtMultiRegionFoam/externalCoupledMultiRegionHeater tut
- generalisation of streamed reading/writing of specialised bcs
ENH: checkMesh: have -writeSets option
- checkMesh has option to write faceSets or (outside of) cellSets as
sampledSurface format. It automatically reconstructs the set on the master
and writes it to the postProcessing folder (as any sampledSurface). E.g.
mpirun -np 6 checkMesh -allTopology -allGeometry -writeSets vtk -parallel
- fixed order writing of symmTensor in Ensight writers
See merge request !8
- checkMesh has option to write faceSets or (outside of) cellSets as
sampledSurface format. It automatically reconstructs the set on the master
and writes it to the postProcessing folder (as any sampledSurface). E.g.
mpirun -np 6 checkMesh -allTopology -allGeometry -writeSets vtk -parallel
- fixed order writing of symmTensor in Ensight writers
ENH: surface: various updates to the surface utilities
surfaceBooleanFeatures: use CGAL for intersection
surfaceCheck: write surface zoning as vtk file
surfaceInflate: new utility to offset surface
surfacePatch: replacement for surfaceAutoPatch. Also does cutting of surfaces.
See merge request !4
- shm: have displacementMotionSolver as alternative mesh shrinker
(instead of medialAxis).
- updated iglooWithFridges tutorial to use displacementLaplacian
- selectable interpolation from cells to points in the motion solvers
using the 'interpolation' keyword:
interpolation volPointInterpolation; // default
or
interpolation patchCorrected (lowerWall upperWall);
- wrapped up mesh shrinkers (see above) for use as a displacementMotionSolver
(i.e. the opposite of the displacementMotionSolver mesh shrinker)
- redistributePar to have almost (complete) functionality of decomposePar+reconstructPar
- low-level distributed Field mapping
- support for mapping surfaceFields (including flipping faces)
- support for decomposing/reconstructing refinement data
Usage: createTurbulenceFields [OPTIONS]
options:
-case <dir> specify alternate case directory, default is the cwd
-constant include the 'constant/' dir in the times list
-fields <wordReList>
specify which turbulence fields (k, epsilon, omega, R) to
write - eg '(k omega)' or '(R)' or '(.*)'.
-latestTime select the latest time
-newTimes select the new times
-noFunctionObjects
do not execute functionObjects
-noZero exclude the '0/' dir from the times list, has precedence
over the -withZero option
-parallel run in parallel
-roots <(dir1 .. dirN)>
slave root directories for distributed running
-time <ranges> comma-separated time ranges - eg, ':10,20,40:70,1000:'
-srcDoc display source code in browser
-doc display application documentation in browser
-help print the usage
Resolves feature request http://www.openfoam.org/mantisbt/view.php?id=1912
surfaceBooleanFeatures: use CGAL for intersection
surfaceCheck: write surface zoning as vtk file
surfaceInflate: new utility to offset surface
surfacePatch: replacement for surfaceAutoPatch. Also does cutting of surfaces.
1. multi-ray shooting. It now shoots rays in all the 3 coordinate directions
from the cell centre. Before it would shoot just a single ray from the
nearest point on the surface, going through the cell centre.
There is a cost overhead in that now it shoots 6 rays (+-x, +-y, +-z)
instead of just 1.
2. bleeding of refinement. It marks the cells inside a gap and walks out
the gap-size to neighbouring cells (which are just outside the gap). This
should make for a smoother refinement pattern.
The built-in explicit symplectic integrator has been replaced by a
general framework supporting run-time selectable integrators. Currently
the explicit symplectic, implicit Crank-Nicolson and implicit Newmark
methods are provided, all of which are 2nd-order in time:
Symplectic 2nd-order explicit time-integrator for 6DoF solid-body motion:
Reference:
Dullweber, A., Leimkuhler, B., & McLachlan, R. (1997).
Symplectic splitting methods for rigid body molecular dynamics.
The Journal of chemical physics, 107(15), 5840-5851.
Can only be used for explicit integration of the motion of the body,
i.e. may only be called once per time-step, no outer-correctors may be
applied. For implicit integration with outer-correctors choose either
CrankNicolson or Newmark schemes.
Example specification in dynamicMeshDict:
solver
{
type symplectic;
}
Newmark 2nd-order time-integrator for 6DoF solid-body motion:
Reference:
Newmark, N. M. (1959).
A method of computation for structural dynamics.
Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 85(3), 67-94.
Example specification in dynamicMeshDict:
solver
{
type Newmark;
gamma 0.5; // Velocity integration coefficient
beta 0.25; // Position integration coefficient
}
Crank-Nicolson 2nd-order time-integrator for 6DoF solid-body motion:
The off-centering coefficients for acceleration (velocity integration) and
velocity (position/orientation integration) may be specified but default
values of 0.5 for each are used if they are not specified. With the default
off-centering this scheme is equivalent to the Newmark scheme with default
coefficients.
Example specification in dynamicMeshDict:
solver
{
type CrankNicolson;
aoc 0.5; // Acceleration off-centering coefficient
voc 0.5; // Velocity off-centering coefficient
}
Both the Newmark and Crank-Nicolson are proving more robust and reliable
than the symplectic method for solving complex coupled problems and the
tutorial cases have been updated to utilize this.
In this new framework it would be straight forward to add other methods
should the need arise.
Henry G. Weller
CFD Direct
