Update readme.md
Now use the standard namings. Corrected spelling errors.
This commit is contained in:
@ -1,49 +1,68 @@
|
||||
This example demonstrate using a bias potential that can be used to study solid-liquid transitions with the interface pinning method. This is done by adding a harmonic potential to the Hamiltonian that bias the system towards two-phase configurations.
|
||||
This example demonstrate using a bias potential that can be used to study solid-liquid transitions
|
||||
with the interface pinning method. This is done by adding a harmonic potential to the Hamiltonian
|
||||
that bias the system towards two-phase configurations.
|
||||
|
||||
U_bias = 0.5*k*(Q-a)^2
|
||||
U_bias = 0.5*K*(Q-a)^2
|
||||
|
||||
The bias field couple to an order-parameter of crystallinity Q
|
||||
This implimentation use long-range order: Q=|rho_k|, where rho_k is the collective density field of the wave-vector k.
|
||||
The bias field couple to an order-parameter of crystallinity Q. The implementation use long-range order:
|
||||
|
||||
Q=|rho_k|,
|
||||
|
||||
where rho_k is the collective density field of the wave-vector k.
|
||||
For future reference we note that the structure factor S(k) is given by the variance of the collective density field:
|
||||
|
||||
S(k)=|rho_k|^2.
|
||||
|
||||
# Reference
|
||||
[Ulf R. Pedersen, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 104102 (2013)]
|
||||
|
||||
Please visit
|
||||
It is recommended to get familiar with the interface pinning method by reading:
|
||||
|
||||
[Ulf R. Pedersen, J. Chem. Phys. 139, 104102 (2013)]
|
||||
|
||||
A detailed bibliography is provided at
|
||||
|
||||
urp.dk/interface_pinning.htm
|
||||
for a detailed bibliography.
|
||||
|
||||
# Use
|
||||
# Use of rhok fix
|
||||
|
||||
fix [name] [groupID] rhok [nx] [ny] [nz] [spring-constant] [anchor-point]
|
||||
For this example we will be using the rhok fix.
|
||||
|
||||
include a harmonic bias potential U_bias=0.5*k*(|rho_k|-a)^2 to the force calculation.
|
||||
The elements of the wave-vector rho_k is k_x = (2 pi / L_x) * n_x, k_y = (2 pi / L_y) * n_y and k_z = (2 pi / L_z) * n_z.
|
||||
fix [name] [groupID] rhok [nx] [ny] [nz] [K] [a]
|
||||
|
||||
# The Interface Pinning method for studying melting transitions
|
||||
We will use the interface pinning method to study melting of the Lennard-Jones system
|
||||
This fix include a harmonic bias potential U_bias=0.5*K*(|rho_k|-a)^2 to the force calculation.
|
||||
The elements of the wave-vector k is given by the nx, ny and nz input:
|
||||
|
||||
k_x = (2 pi / L_x) * n_x, k_y = (2 pi / L_y) * n_y and k_z = (2 pi / L_z) * n_z.
|
||||
|
||||
We will use a k vector that correspond to a Bragg peak.
|
||||
|
||||
# The Interface Pinning method for studying melting transitions of the Lennard-Jones (LJ) system
|
||||
|
||||
We will use the interface pinning method to study melting of the LJ system
|
||||
at temperature 0.8 and pressure 2.185. This is a coexistence state-point, and the method
|
||||
can be used to show this. The present directory contains the input files:
|
||||
can be used to show this. The present directory contains the input files that we will use:
|
||||
|
||||
crystal.lmp
|
||||
setup.lmp
|
||||
pinning.lmp
|
||||
in.crystal
|
||||
in.setup
|
||||
in.pinning
|
||||
|
||||
1. First we will determine the density of the crystal with the LAMMPS input file crystal.lmp.
|
||||
From the output we get that the average density after equbriliation is 0.9731.
|
||||
We need this density to ensure hydrostatic pressure when in a two-phase simulation.
|
||||
1. First we will determine the density of the crystal with the LAMMPS input file in.crystal.
|
||||
From the output we get that the average density after equilibration is 0.9731.
|
||||
We need this density to ensure hydrostatic pressure when in a two-phase simulation.
|
||||
|
||||
2. Next, we setup a two-phase configuration using setup.lmp.
|
||||
2. Next, we setup a two-phase configuration using in.setup.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Finally, we run a two-phase simulation with the bias-field applied using pinning.lmp.
|
||||
The last coulmn in the output show |rho_k|. We note that after a equbriliation period
|
||||
the value fluctuates aroung the anchor point (a) -- showing that this is indeed a coexistence
|
||||
state point.
|
||||
3. Finally, we run a two-phase simulation with the bias-field applied using in.pinning.
|
||||
The last column in the output show |rho_k|. We note that after a equilibration period
|
||||
the value fluctuates around the anchor point (a) -- showing that this is indeed a coexistence
|
||||
state point.
|
||||
|
||||
The reference [J. Chem. Phys. 139, 104102 (2013)] gives details on using the method to find coexitence state points,
|
||||
and the referecee [J. Chem. Phys. 142, 044104 (2015)] show how the crystal growth rate can be computed.
|
||||
The reference [J. Chem. Phys. 139, 104102 (2013)] gives details on using the method to find coexistence state points,
|
||||
and the reference [J. Chem. Phys. 142, 044104 (2015)] show how the crystal growth rate can be computed from fluctuations.
|
||||
That method have been experienced to be most effective in the slightly super-heated regime above the melting temperature.
|
||||
|
||||
# Contact
|
||||
|
||||
Ulf R. Pedersen
|
||||
http://www.urp.dk
|
||||
ulf AT urp.dk
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user